GRANDPARENT VISITATION
By Sari M. Friedman
In the year 2000, the
United States Supreme Court, in a case called Troxel v. Granville, ruled
that Washington State’s non-parent visitation statute is unconstitutional.The
question is, how does that affect grandparent visitation rights in New York?
New York Non-Parent Visitation Law
If a grandparent, or
grandparents, seek visitation rights when both of the child(ren)’s parents are
alive, Section 72 of the Domestic Relations Law of the State of New York,
requires the Court to seek to first determine if the grandparents have standing
to seek visitation.To determine whether standing exists, state law shows the
Court looks at the history of the relationship between grandparents and child.Was there regular contact?Have the grandparents made diligent efforts to have
regular contact with their grandchildren?Did the parents frustrate any attempt
at a relationship, and if so, why?In other words, the nature and the extent of
the grandparent/grandchild relationship is an essential part of the inquiry.So
too is the nature and the basis of a parent’s objection to visitation.The
Court will then determine if it is in the best interests of the child to have
grandparent visitation.
Things are a little
easier if one of the child’s parents is deceased.Here, the main criterion is
simply the child’s best interest to have grandparent visitation.
To sum it all up, the
nature and extent of the grandparent-grandchild relationship is an essential
part of the Court’s inquiry.So too is the nature and basis of the parents’
objection to visitation.In other words, the Court analyzes what it requires of
grandparents in the context of what circumstances allowed them to reasonably do.
How Does the Supreme Court Ruling Affect New York?
In determining that
Washington State’s Non-parent Visitation Statute was unconstitutional, the
United States Supreme Court made it clear that it rested its decision on the
sweeping breadth of the Washington statute which allowed anyone (not just
grandparents) to seek visitation.The Supreme Court did not consider whether
all non-parent visitation statutes must be stricken as violating parental rights
to make decisions concerning the care and control of their children.
In New York, the
question became whether, after Troxel, the Courts would continue to
grant grandparent visitation under DRL Section 72 and existing case law, or
would they conclude that such law is unconstitutional after the Supreme Court’s
Troxel decision.
Two family
courts in New York have held that it would not apply Troxel in applications
before it for grandparent visitation. The first family court was in the
Appellate Division Second Judicial Dept. , case entitled Smolen v. Smolen and
the second was in the Fourth Appellate Dept. entitled Fitzpatrick v. Young.
Conclusion
Thus, in New York, a
grandparent who wants visitation may seek the same even after the United
States Supreme Court’s Troxel decision.If the grandparent can establish
standing as detailed above, and is able to show that it is in the child’s best
interest to have visitation, then the Court should order visitation.